On April 9, 2025, President Trump issued an Executive Order titled “Reforming Foreign Defense Sales to Improve Speed and Accountability.” This directive is the first Executive Order ever issued by a U.S. President on the foreign military sales (FMS) process and sets in motion a substantial modernization. The Order aims to strengthen U.S. global competitiveness, advance strategic objectives, and ensure that trusted allies and partners receive American defense systems more swiftly and reliably.

While the Executive Order is historic, it builds on previously proposed reforms from Congress and the Department of Defense (DoD). In 2024, the House Foreign Affairs Committee published a “Foreign Military Sales Tiger Task Force Report,” which offered legislative reforms to the FMS process (Foreign Affairs FMS Report). A 2023 “Tiger Team” report identified chronic inefficiencies in the U.S. arms sales system and laid out comprehensive recommendations for reform (DoD Tiger Team Report). Though not explicitly cited, many elements of the Executive Order reflect the Congressional and DoD findings. 

White House Fact Sheet Highlights

According to the White House, the Executive Order will:

Alignment with Tiger Team and Industry Reform Demands

The Executive Order responds to long-standing frustrations voiced by both industry stakeholders and foreign governments regarding the slow, opaque, and risk-averse nature of the current U.S. arms transfer process. In particular, it echoes recommendations made by the DoD 2023 Tiger Team, including:

Together, these reforms aim to bolster U.S. credibility as a security partner while helping trusted allies access advanced capabilities amid growing regional threats.

Congressional Support and Competitive Implications

Senator Jim Risch (R-Idaho), Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, welcomed the Executive Order, stating that “our current system suffocates our ability to support our partners” and praising the new directive for its potential to “unclog the system” and push back against Russian and Chinese influence (Risch Statement).

Industry voices echoed this sentiment. As reported by Breaking Defense, defense firms see the order as a major opportunity to improve predictability, increase deal flow, and adapt to a changing security landscape in which U.S. competitors often outpace Washington on speed and flexibility (Breaking Defense).

Strategic Takeaways

What Comes Next?

Within the next 60–120 days, the Departments of State and Defense are required to deliver:

Stakeholders should actively monitor implementation guidance and identify ways to influence agency priorities, program selections, and regulatory interpretations.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *