Effective June 2025, New York began implementing significant changes for the fashion industry with respect to the practices of model engagement under the provisions of the new Fashion Workers Act (FWA).1 While the name of the new law suggests applicability to a broad range of creative talent and labor across the fashion supply chain, the scope of FWA focuses exclusively on models.

FWA is the first U.S. law to introduce transparency requirements for model contracts, impose fiduciary duties on model management companies, and establish new workplace protections for models working in New York State. This article discusses the history of fashion regulation and the main requirements under FWA, and makes recommendations for how fashion businesses should address compliance with FWA.

History of Fashion Regulation

Generally, the fashion industry does not have any significant industry-specific regulation, at least not when it comes to engaging models or other creative talent. Fashion industry participants may instead be governed by a patchwork of more general laws pertaining to labor and employment, data privacy, advertising, environmental, trade and import/export, antitrust and competition, intellectual property (IP including those protecting trademarks, copyrights, and patents), and right of publicity, as well as emerging laws pertaining to generative AI technology that may be used to replicate models’ likenesses (often referred to as “Deep Fakes”).

Unlike talent agencies, modeling agencies have historically classified themselves as management companies under New York General Business Law § 171(8) and models as independent contractors instead of employees. This classification exempted modeling agencies from following New York’s labor protection requirements, such as minimum wage, overtime, or safety requirements. Individual model contracts would often include difficult to understand compensation and fee structures, unclear payment deadlines, and multi-year term durations that would tie the model to the agency. At the same time, models – typically young people that may lack legal and business experience or support structures – working in New York City would have to deal with high rents and costs of living. While lacking clarity on when and how much they would be paid, models were frequently required to work long hours without adequate breaks or overtime pay. This imbalance of power is further compounded by a possible requirement to pose nude and related safety issues; being asked to wear garments or pose in settings that may present a risk of physical injury; and the proliferation of the use AI-generated portraits of models for which the model may not be compensated.

Concerns about potential exploitation of young people working as models were increasingly brought to the attention of legislators by activists and consumers related to transparency and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) accountability in the fashion industry. New York’s new FWA, enacted in response to the concerns raised by members of the public, is a comprehensive novel framework in the fashion industry with which participants need to become familiar.

The Fashion Workers Act

The legislative justification memo accompanying FWA emphasizes New York’s central role in the U.S. fashion industry: it is home to world-renowned creative talent, leading production companies, and top fashion and design schools. The memo states that New York’s fashion industry employs 180,000 people, accounting for 6 percent of the New York City’s workforce, and generates a total of $10.9 billion in wages. A prime example of its significant economic impact is New York Fashion Week, a semiannual series of events where designers showcase their collections to buyers, the press, and the general public. The enterprise brings in nearly $600 million in income each year.

The legislative justification memo further states that despite the massive success of New York’s fashion industry, the creative workforce behind the industry’s success – specifically, models, influencers, and performing artists – are generally not afforded basic labor protections in New York. The new Act aims to address the persistent inequity in New York’s modeling sector, such as unfair contracts and payment practices, and create a system that imposes various requirements and prohibitions on model management companies and clients.

FWA defines the following terms: 

FWA applies to model management companies that engage in business in New York or enter into any arrangement with a client or model for the purpose of providing services in New York. In other words, this Act applies to any entity using a fee-based structure to hire models in New York, including model management companies and fashion businesses working with them, as well those who engage models directly for photoshoots and other ad campaigns in New York.

Key requirements and prohibitions on model management companies (or agencies)

Key requirements and prohibitions for clients:

Clients shall:

NYDOL will be the primary enforcer of the FWA. Violators may be subject to a civil penalty for up to $3,000 for a first violation and $5,000 for a second or subsequent violation. Models have the right to file an action in court or a complaint with the NYDOL within six years of the alleged violations. The New York State Attorney General also will have a right to file an action to enforce FWA if there is a reasonable cause to believe that a model management company, a model management group, or a client has repeatedly engaged in illegal or fraudulent business practices.3

Impact of the Act

This Act will be a big change for models and modeling agencies in New York, holding agencies accountable and providing models with basic labor rights. Outside New York, no other U.S. state has adopted a fashion industry–specific law regulating agencies or protecting models in a similarly comprehensive way. Because New York is so influential in the fashion industry, it is likely that it will be a trailblazer for other states, such as California, to introduce similar protections for fashion workers in their states.

Conclusion

Agencies and fashion businesses should start preparing now in order to comply with the new law. Some key points of the law and issues to consider may include:

This is not an exhaustive list, nor does failing to comply with each point render the agency or client noncompliant with FWA. Every situation is different and action should be taken after consultation with a lawyer familiar with the industry.


1 FWA is available at https://legislation.nysenate.gov/pdf/bills/2023/s2477a

2 The term “digital replica” is defined in FWA as “a significant, computer-generated or artificial intelligence-enhanced representation of a model’s likeliness, including but not limited to, their face, body or voice, which substantially replicates or replaces the model’s appearance or performance, excluding routine photographic edits such as color correction, minor retouching, or other standard post-production modifications.” Notably, if the AI enforcement moratorium that is currently part of the pending federal budget reconciliation bill ultimately passes – and it is poised to pass – enforcement of state law requirements pertaining to generative AI may be suspended for ten (10) years. 

3 New York State Fashion Workers Act FAQ, available at https://dol.ny.gov/new-york-state-fashion-workers-act-faqs

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *