Nevada has long been at the forefront of autonomous vehicle (AV) technology, with the state boldly moving toward fully driverless cars as a normal part of its infrastructure. However, as AV technology continues to advance and increase the number of vehicles on its roads, public policy, regulatory, and safety concerns have come into play. Senate Bill 395 (SB395), introduced in the 2025 legislative session, seeks to correct these issues by modifying major provisions for the operation of autonomous vehicles in Nevada.

SB395 will change the operation of autonomous vehicles from state to state. At present, completely autonomous vehicles may be driven without a human driver present, provided certain conditions are satisfied. SB395 would, however, regulate these autonomous cars by placing further operating restrictions on them and altering the need for human presence to drive them. This is primarily due to the growing concern about AV safety and preparedness to support advanced real-world driving conditions.

Key Provisions of SB395:

  1. Human Operator Requirements – The most significant alteration in SB395 is the need for a human operator to be on board in fully autonomous vehicles—at least in the short run—until the technology is proven to be completely safe and reliable. This requirement is intended to provide an immediate human intervention in the event of unforeseen circumstances or system failure.
  2. Increased Safety Standards – The legislation demands increased safety standards in autonomous vehicles, such as the creation of new testing procedures to assess the actions of cars in challenging driving circumstances, and enhanced manufacturer standards to prove their vehicles can navigate all kinds of road conditions in a safe and secure manner.
  3. Insurance and Liability Adjustments – SB395 would also mandate car manufacturers to maintain certain types of insurance to protect against the risk of damages caused by AV-related accidents. This could include greater liability coverage because self-driving cars bring about new risks.
  4. Data and Reporting Mandates – The bill would demand more data gathering and reporting requirements on autonomous car manufacturers. This would allow regulators in the state to track the performance and safety record of AVs, ensuring that the technology is responsibly developed.

Potential Benefits of SB395:

Challenges and Potential Drawbacks:

Looking Ahead: The Future of Autonomous Vehicles in Nevada

As autonomous vehicle technology continues to develop, Nevada’s role as a testing ground for AVs remains significant. SB395 is a major move toward balancing the potential of innovation with the need for public safety and regulatory oversight. While it may slow the roll-out of fully autonomous vehicles, it sets the stage for an era where autonomous vehicles can integrate into society more safely and responsibly.

As autonomous vehicle laws continue to evolve, working with a knowledgeable car accident lawyer can help individuals understand how new regulations like SB395 might impact accident liability and insurance issues.

The result of SB395 will have implications far beyond Nevada, establishing a precedent for other states contemplating similar legislation for self-driving cars. It will also affect manufacturers’ strategy regarding safety, insurance, and the introduction of fully autonomous technology in the next few years.


Endnotes:

Nevada Legislature. Senate Bill 395 – 83rd Session (2025). Retrieved from: leg.state.nv.us ↩

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. “Automated Vehicles for Safety.” Accessed 2024. ↩

Insurance Information Institute. “The Future of Insurance in Autonomous Vehicles.” 2023. ↩

American Automobile Association (AAA). “Public Opinion on Autonomous Vehicles.” 2023. ↩

U.S. Department of Transportation. “Automated Vehicle Policy.” FMCSA, 2023. ↩

Autonomous Vehicle Industry Association. “Current Safety Protocols for Autonomous Vehicle Testing.” 2022. ↩

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *