Go-To Guide:
  • On April 16, 2025, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)’s chief legal officer issued a memorandum to CFPB staff that set out the agency’s 2025 supervision and enforcement priorities. 
     
  • Per the memorandum, the CFPB is likely to only exercise authority it has expressly been granted via statute and then only for “actual” and “tangible” consumer harms to “identifiable victims with material and measurable consumer damages.”
     
  • Where permissible, the agency appears poised to defer to states and other federal agencies’ supervisory and enforcement activities.
     
  • The CFPB will shift focus away from fintechs and in favor of the largest banks and depository institutions.

On April 16, 2025, the CFPB’s Chief Legal Officer, Mark R. Paoletta, issued a memorandum to CFPB staff that sets out the agency’s 2025 supervision and enforcement priorities.

The memorandum, which the CFPB has not publicly released, provides that the CFPB “will focus its enforcement and supervision resources on pressing threats to consumers” and that, in order to focus on “tangible harms to consumers,” the CFPB will “shift resources away from enforcement and supervision that can be done by the States.”

The memorandum also rescinds all prior enforcement and supervision priority documents and explains the CFPB’s focus in 2025 will be on the following:

  loans or other initiatives for “justice involved” individuals, which the memorandum clarifies to mean “criminals”
 
  medical debt
 
  peer-to-peer platforms and lending
 
  student loans
 
  remittances
 
  consumer data
 
  digital payments
  mortgages, as the highest priority
 
  the Fair Credit Reporting Act and Regulation V data furnishing violations
 
  the Fair Debt Collection Act and Regulation F violations relating to consumer contracts and debts
 
  fraudulent overcharges, fees, etc.
 
  inadequate controls to protect consumer information resulting in “actual loss” to consumers

Key Takeaways

The memorandum represents what is likely to be a drastic reduction in CFPB supervision and enforcement activity and encouragement for some state agencies to increase their oversight.

Instead of an agency that utilizes an expansive view of its authority to redress what it perceives as consumer harms, the memorandum suggests that the CFPB under the Trump administration will instead only look to exercise powers that it is explicitly granted via statute and, even then, only to address “actual” and “tangible” consumer harms. And, where permissible, the CFPB appears poised to defer to other federal agencies and the state regulators.

The reduced focus on fintechs, P2P platforms, consumer data, and digital payments will likely be well received by nonbanks, but all in the industry should be vigilant for state regulators to step into the space vacated by the CFPB.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *