Choosing the right business entity is a critical decision for business owners, as it directly impacts tax obligations and financial responsibilities. Partnerships and S Corporations are popular pass-through entities, meaning the business’s income flows to the owners’ personal tax returns. However, each entity type has unique tax implications, and understanding these differences is essential for anyone considering these options.
Tax Structure Overview
Introduction to Partnerships
Partnerships are pass-through entities, meaning that the entity does not pay income tax. Instead, profits, losses, deductions, and credits flow through to the individual partners, who report these items on their individual income tax returns. This structure allows partnerships to avoid the double taxation that corporations face, as income is only taxed once—at the individual partner level. However, one implication of this setup is that partners are taxed on their distributive share of the income, whether or not they receive it as a cash distribution.
One advantage of partnerships is the flexibility in income allocation. Through special allocations, partners can distribute profits and losses in a way that may not be strictly proportional to their ownership interest, provided the allocation has a substantial economic effect. This flexibility can benefit partnerships, especially compared to the more rigid allocation rules that S Corporations must follow.
Additionally, partnerships can utilize Section 704(c) allocations to allocate pre-contribution gains and losses to the contributing partner. For example, if a partner contributes property with a fair market value higher than its tax basis, Section 704(c) allows the partnership to allocate the built-in gain directly to the contributing partner. This enables a fair distribution of economic benefits and liabilities, reflecting the true economic situation of each partner.
Introduction to S Corporations
Like partnerships, S Corporations are also pass-through entities, meaning they avoid entity-level taxation. Income, deductions, and credits are reported on the shareholders’ individual tax returns based on their ownership percentage. However, S Corporations are subject to a single class of stock requirement, which mandates that all distributions be proportional to each shareholder’s ownership interest. This rule limits flexibility in allocating income, losses, and deductions, distinguishing S Corporations from partnerships.
S Corporations also face limitations on shareholder eligibility and the number of shareholders they can have, which is limited at 100. Only certain individuals, trusts, and estates are permitted as shareholders, and all shareholders must be U.S. citizens or residents. Additionally, S Corporations must follow strict rules for allocating income on a per-share, per-day basis over the tax year, meaning income is divided based on each shareholder’s stake and the number of days they owned the shares within the tax period. This differs from partnerships, where allocations can vary based on the partnership agreement, provided they meet specific economic effect tests.
Self-Employment Taxes
Partnerships
Partners in a partnership are considered self-employed, which means they are responsible for paying self-employment taxes on their entire share of the business income. This tax includes both the employer and employee portions of Social Security and Medicare taxes, totaling 15.3%. So, a partner with $120,000 in income would pay $18,360 in self-employment tax.
Partnerships also allow partners to deduct half of their self-employment tax when calculating their taxable income, effectively reducing the tax’s impact. However, despite this deduction, the overall tax rate on the income is still substantial, effectively around 14.1% once the deduction is factored in. This can make self-employment taxes quite significant for higher-earning partners, as the tax applies to the total distributive share of income, regardless of whether it is distributed or reinvested in the business.
S Corporations
S Corporations offer a different approach, providing opportunities for self-employment tax savings. Shareholders who provide services in the business must pay themselves a reasonable salary, which is subject to FICA taxes (Social Security and Medicare). However, any additional earnings can be taken as dividends, which are not subject to self-employment tax, allowing for potential tax savings.
To illustrate, let’s assume an S Corporation owner has the same $120,000 net income. They take $60,000 as salary and $60,000 as profit distributions. Here’s how the tax breaks down:
The salary of $60,000 incurs self-employment tax at 15.3%, resulting in $9,180 in payroll taxes.
The remaining $60,000, taken as profit distributions, avoids self-employment tax, saving $9,180 compared to the partnership scenario, where the full amount would have been taxed.
When Does the S Corporation Election Make Sense?
Generally, electing S Corporation status for self-employment tax savings starts to make sense when net business income exceeds approximately $80,000 to $100,000. Below this range, the compliance costs of maintaining payroll and other S Corporation requirements may outweigh the tax benefits. As income rises, particularly over $100,000, the tax savings from distributing earnings as dividends become more substantial, making the S Corporation an attractive option.
However, it is essential to note that the IRS requires S Corporation owners to pay themselves a reasonable salary. If the salary is set too low, the IRS may reclassify dividends as wages, potentially resulting in back taxes and penalties. For this reason, S Corporations can offer considerable tax benefits, but only if salaries align with industry standards, and compliance is diligently managed.
Basis, Deduction, and Loss Limitations
Partnerships
In a partnership, a partner’s basis in the partnership is vital for determining their ability to deduct losses. Basis starts with the partner’s initial investment and can be increased by additional contributions, their share of income, and their share of partnership debt. Basis is essentially the amount of a partner’s investment in the partnership. It determines how much loss they can deduct and how much they can withdraw without additional tax liability.
Partnerships also follow IRS Code Section 704(d), which means that partners can only deduct losses up to their basis in the partnership, which includes their share of the partnership’s debt. In addition to basis limitations, partners must consider at-risk and passive activity loss limitations. The at-risk rules, under Section 465, restrict the ability to deduct losses only to the amount the partner has at risk, which may differ from their basis if non-recourse financing is involved. These rules prevent partners from deducting more losses than the amount they are financially exposed to in the business. Passive activity loss rules, as outlined in Section 469, further limit loss deductions for partners not actively involved in the business.
S Corporations
In S Corporations, shareholders face basis limitations for loss deductions, but the structure is slightly more restrictive. A shareholder’s basis is limited to their direct investments in the corporation and any loans made directly to the S Corporation by the shareholder. Unlike partnerships, shareholders cannot increase their basis through the corporation’s debt, as corporate debts are generally not considered part of the individual shareholder’s at-risk amount unless they personally guarantee the loan.
S Corporation shareholders can only deduct losses up to their basis in the stock and direct loans to the corporation. The lack of debt-basis allocation means that S Corporation shareholders may face a faster limitation on loss deductions than their counterparts in partnerships.
Additionally, like partnerships, S Corporation shareholders must navigate the at-risk and passive activity loss rules, which may further restrict loss deductions based on their level of active involvement.
For both entity types, it’s important to remember that basis not only impacts loss deductions but also affects tax-free distributions. If distributions exceed the basis, they may be taxed as capital gains. Additionally, both partnerships and S Corporations limit loss deductions through basis, at-risk, and passive activity restrictions, which can impact tax planning. Partnerships tend to offer more flexibility and potential for higher basis due to debt allocation, making them more suitable for those looking to leverage loss deductions.
Finally, one key takeaway is that S Corporations are not ideal for holding appreciating assets, like real estate. When assets are distributed from an S Corporation, they are treated as if sold at fair market value, triggering potential capital gains taxes. Partnerships, on the other hand, allow for greater flexibility in property contributions and distributions, often without immediate tax consequences, making them a more suitable structure for real estate and other appreciating assets.
Distribution Rules
Partnerships
Partnerships offer significant flexibility in distributions, allowing partners to customize how and when profits are distributed, as specified in the partnership agreement. Distributions do not have to be proportionate to each partner’s ownership interest, enabling partners to tailor distributions based on capital contributions, work contributions, or other factors as agreed upon by all parties.
Regarding tax treatment, partnership distributions are generally not taxable to the partner as long as they don’t exceed the partner’s basis in the partnership. If a distribution does exceed the partner’s basis, the excess amount is treated as a capital gain. This flexibility makes partnerships an attractive choice for owners who wish to structure distributions to align with individual financial needs and varying levels of involvement. Additionally, partnerships can distribute property to partners without immediate tax consequences, allowing assets to be distributed on an adjusted basis rather than at fair market value. This can benefit partners receiving appreciated property like real estate.
S Corporations
S Corporations, on the other hand, are bound by the single class of stock rule, which requires that all distributions be made on a pro-rata basis. This means distributions must align strictly with each shareholder’s ownership percentage, ensuring that all shareholders receive equal treatment relative to their ownership interest. For example, if one shareholder owns 25% of the S Corporation and another owns 75%, all distributions must be made in that same 25%-75% proportion, which limits flexibility in tailoring distributions based on varying shareholder contributions. You must distribute this way to avoid the IRS revoking your S Corporation tax status.
From a tax perspective, S Corporation distributions are generally not taxable to the shareholder if they do not exceed the shareholder’s stock basis. However, distributions exceeding stock basis are subject to capital gains tax. It is also important to note that S Corporations must distribute appreciated property at fair market value, triggering potential capital gains tax on any appreciated assets distributed. For this reason, business owners looking to hold and potentially distribute appreciating assets, such as real estate, might find S Corporations less advantageous.
The distribution rules play a significant role in determining which entity type best fits a business’s needs. Partnerships offer flexibility for business owners looking to customize distributions, potentially allowing them to leverage specific tax planning strategies around capital gains and loss recognition. S Corporations, while tax-efficient for income distributions due to the self-employment tax advantages, limit flexibility due to their requirement for equal treatment among shareholders and may incur additional taxes on appreciated property distributions.
Partnerships are ideal for businesses distributing appreciating assets, like real estate, or where owners contribute differently. The flexible structure allows for custom distributions aligned with individual contributions and doesn’t trigger immediate capital gains on appreciated assets.
In contrast, S Corporations are well-suited for closely held businesses with shareholders who have similar roles and ownership stakes. The pro-rata distribution requirement simplifies the process, ensuring that all shareholders receive distributions based on their ownership percentage. Additionally, the S Corporation structure offers significant self-employment tax savings, making it a powerful tax-saving option when shareholders actively work in the business and receive salary and dividend distributions.
Both partnerships and S Corporations offer distinct tax advantages and limitations, choosing between them a critical decision for business owners. Partnerships provide flexibility in income allocation, greater ease in distributing appreciating assets, and enhanced options for deducting losses. On the other hand, S Corporations deliver potential self-employment tax savings and streamlined, proportional distributions, which can benefit closely held businesses. Ultimately, the best entity choice will depend on your business’s goals, ownership structure, and tax planning needs. Consulting with a tax professional can help ensure you select the entity type that aligns with your long-term financial strategy and maximizes your tax benefits.
Donovan Thiessen, CPA is the founder and owner of The Accountant, LLC. Our mission is to help business owners make better decisions by providing timely and accurate financial and tax analysis. You may reach Donovan at [email protected], www.theaccountant.cpa, and 702.389.2727.
The post Choosing Between Partnerships and S Corporations: Key Tax Implications for Business Owners appeared first on Vegas Legal Magazine.