Former Qantas Employees Set to Receive Landmark Compensation Following Court Ruling
In a groundbreaking decision, Australia’s Federal Court has opened the floodgates for approximately 1,700 former Qantas Airways employees to receive substantial financial restitution, marking a significant victory for workers’ rights amid ongoing corporate scrutiny. The ruling, announced on October 18, 2024, mandates that Qantas pay over AUD 200 million (GBP 103 million) in compensation and penalties, following the court’s determination that the airline unlawfully outsourced nearly 1,700 ground staff positions during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Legal Battle: A Long Time Coming
The tumultuous saga began in 2016 when the Transport Workers’ Union of Australia (TWU) filed a lawsuit against Qantas, asserting that the airline’s decision to terminate employees under the guise of cost-cutting measures was illegal. Justice Michael Lee ruled that Qantas’s actions were primarily driven by a relentless focus on reducing expenses, even as the pandemic presented unique challenges for the aviation sector.
In his 74-page ruling, Justice Lee emphasized that Qantas’s redundancy actions were not only unjust but also an attempt to sidestep employees’ rights to negotiate new agreements. “The airline’s choices were primarily motivated by a desire to cut costs,” he stated, highlighting that employees would likely have faced termination regardless of the pandemic due to Qantas’s broader cost-cutting strategies.
Compensation Details
As part of the ruling, three affected employees—Christopher Carney, Nicholas Bennett, and Leonie Piggott—were awarded AUD 170,000 (GBP 87,000) in damages. Notably, Mr. Bennett received AUD 100,000 (GBP 51,000) for the severe psychiatric effects stemming from his dismissal, which included depression and anxiety. Meanwhile, Mr. Carney and Ms. Piggott were compensated AUD 30,000 (GBP 15,500) and AUD 40,000 (GBP 20,500), respectively, for their emotional distress.
With the court’s decision, the stage is set for the remaining affected employees to claim compensation, as the TWU prepares to pursue a total claim exceeding AUD 100 million on behalf of all impacted workers.
Qantas’s Response and Future Implications
In the wake of this landmark ruling, Qantas CEO Vanessa Hudson publicly expressed regret, acknowledging the emotional and financial toll the situation has inflicted on employees and their families. “We aspire to offer closure to those affected,” Hudson stated, committing to expedite the compensation process.
However, Qantas is facing mounting pressure to not only settle this case but also to restore its public image. Nick McIntosh, assistant secretary of the TWU’s New South Wales branch, emphasized the importance of holding Qantas accountable for what he deemed “the largest illegal dismissal by a significant margin.” He asserted that any financial repercussions should act as a deterrent for other corporations contemplating similar actions.
Related: Covid Fraud: A Costly Side-Effect Of The Pandemic
The Human Cost of Corporate Decisions
Among the affected, Don Dixon, who was outsourced by Qantas but not part of this lawsuit, condemned the airline’s conduct. “This has left many employees, especially older ones, struggling to find new jobs,” he lamented, highlighting the challenges faced by workers in a tough job market.
Next Steps
The case is set to return to court on November 15, 2024, for further proceedings, as the TWU seeks to ensure that justice is served for all affected employees. With the ruling establishing a precedent, this case serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of protecting workers’ rights, especially in challenging times.
As Qantas grapples with the consequences of its decisions during the pandemic, the landmark ruling by Australia’s Federal Court signals a turning point for employee rights in the corporate sector. The implications of this case could resonate far beyond the aviation industry, sending a clear message to companies nationwide that unjust employment practices will not go unchallenged.
Legal Counsel
In the case of Transport Workers’ Union of Australia v Qantas Airways Limited, the applicant was represented by Mark Gibian SC from HB Higgins Chambers and Philip Boncardo from Wardell Chambers, with instructions provided by Maurice Blackburn. The respondent’s representation included Richard Dalton KC, Matthew Follett KC, and Nico Burmeister from the Victorian Bar, who were instructed by Herbert Smith Freehills.