London Solicitor Linda Lu Sentenced to 5.5 Years for Stalking Neighbours.

Linda Lu, 35, a solicitor with experience at prestigious US law firms in London, has been sentenced to five and a half years in prison after being found guilty of stalking her neighbours. The case, which unfolded over several months, involved a disturbing campaign of harassment, including verbal abuse, loud music, and persistent noise, causing significant distress to the victims.

The Stalking Campaign: A Pattern of Distress

The conviction of Linda Lu and her mother, Susan Chen, follows a series of disturbing actions that the court found to be “persistent, calculated, and appalling.” Lu’s behaviour included sending derogatory abuse filled with foul language, playing loud, mocking music, and creating loud banging and metallic noises that disturbed her neighbours’ peace. The victims, subjected to constant harassment, reported significant emotional and psychological distress.

The harassment, described by Lincolnshire Police, was not an isolated incident but part of a sustained campaign aimed at causing maximum distress to the victims. Despite warnings and legal measures taken before formal charges were brought, Lu and her mother continued their actions, including sending numerous vexatious civil letters of claim to their victims.

The Legal Background: High-Profile Career Before Conviction

Before her conviction, Linda Lu had built a notable legal career in London, working at several prominent US law firms, including Fried Frank, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, and Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman. She had completed her legal training at the Scottish firm Dickson Minto and became a qualified solicitor in 2015. Her career in prestigious firms gave her a high-profile reputation, but the stalking charges and subsequent conviction have dramatically impacted her professional standing.

The trial, which had been expected to last only seven days, ended up running for six weeks due to the complexities of the case. Both Lu and her mother were convicted of stalking under the Protection from Harassment Act, which applies when the actions of the defendant cause significant alarm or distress to the victim. The court found that Lu’s behaviour was not only prolonged but also designed to cause the maximum amount of distress possible to the victims.

Restraining Orders and Sentencing

In addition to the prison sentence, Linda Lu and her mother, Susan Chen, were each imposed with indefinite restraining orders. These orders prohibit the pair from contacting the victims, their families, witnesses, or their employers. They are also banned from entering the village of Bassingham, where the victims reside. Furthermore, a separate restraining order was issued forbidding any contact, direct or indirect, with the police officers involved in the case.

Judge James House KC, during the sentencing, described the case as one of the most serious instances of stalking he had encountered. He remarked that Lu and her mother’s behaviour had been “persistent, calculated, and appalling,” designed to cause as much harm as possible to the victims. The severity of the actions and the ongoing distress they caused led to the harsh sentence.

The Role of Legal Warnings and Protection Measures

Before formal charges were filed, both Lu and her mother had already received community protection notices and warning letters regarding their behaviour. Despite multiple arrests and legal warnings, including a series of community protection measures, the harassment continued. This disregard for legal notices and the escalation of their conduct ultimately led to formal charges being brought against them.

The pair’s ongoing harassment culminated in a six-week trial, which ultimately resulted in their convictions. The severity of the stalking charges, combined with the victims’ distress, demonstrated the impact that such behaviour can have, particularly when individuals in positions of legal and professional authority are involved.

Impact on the Victims

The victims of Linda Lu and Susan Chen’s stalking campaign have expressed relief at the conclusion of the trial, but the psychological toll on them has been immense. The continuous harassment, including loud noises and slanderous verbal abuse, caused significant emotional distress over a prolonged period. The indefinite restraining orders provide some relief, but the emotional and mental scars left by the harassment are likely to last much longer.

Broader Implications for the Legal Profession

Linda Lu’s conviction also raises important questions about the behaviour of solicitors and professionals in high-pressure legal environments. While Lu’s case is an isolated incident, it serves as a reminder that legal professionals, like anyone else, are not immune to the consequences of criminal behaviour. Her previous roles at major US law firms in London and her successful legal career make her actions even more shocking to the public and her professional peers.

Her conviction has prompted discussions within the legal profession about the potential for more stringent oversight of legal professionals’ conduct, both in their personal and professional lives. It also raises concerns about the level of harassment and abuse that some individuals may endure from neighbours, particularly when the perpetrators are professionals with significant resources.

 

Innsworth Capital Challenges Mastercard Settlement in Walter Merricks Case