Success of the SEC Whistleblower Program

Benjamin Schiffrin, Director of Securities Policy at Better Markets, published a report titled The SEC’s Whistleblower Program Is Key to Protecting the Economy and Main Street Americans’ Walletswhich concludes that the SEC whistleblower program “has benefited investors by allowing the SEC to pursue enforcement actions resulting in more than $6 billion in monetary sanctions” and identify misconduct that the SEC might not otherwise uncover.

The report identifies additional indications of the success of the SEC whistleblower program:

SEC Whistleblower Program Key to Investor Protection

The report finds that the SEC is already underfunded and lacks the resources necessary to monitor the increasingly complex capital markets and “protect investors from potential misconduct at 33,000 regulated entities, 8,300 reporting companies, and 56,000 private funds.”  If Congress forces the SEC to downsize the Division of Enforcement, the SEC would need more help in holding fraudsters accountable and therefore whistleblowers will continue to play a vital role in assisting the government in identifying and prosecuting misconduct.  The violations that whistleblowers report to the SEC primarily concern manipulation, offering fraud, corporate disclosures, and crypto fraud.

Suggestions to Improve the SEC Whistleblower Program

Better Markets makes two suggestions to improve the SEC whistleblower program:

  1. Do a Better Job of Communicating with Whistleblowers:  “Many whistleblowers receive confirmation that the SEC received their tip and then never hear from the agency again. This makes it difficult for whistleblowers to know how to proceed . . . Communicating with whistleblowers is especially important because it can take years for the SEC to receive a tip, investigate, bring an action, obtain sanctions, and issue an award.”
  2. Provide More Information to Enable the SEC to Understand the Benefits of the Whistleblower Program:  “[T]he whistleblower program would benefit from the public’s greater understanding of the assistance that whistleblowers provide . . . and the value to the public of the whistleblower having identified the relevant misconduct.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *